Babri Masjid
Interior of Babri Masjid
Hindu terrorists destroying the Babri Mosque
The Babri Mosque was a mosque constructed by first Mughal emperor of India, Babur, in Ayodhya in the 16th century. Hindus believed it to be the birth place of Lord Rama. It was destroyed by a mob of Hindu fanatics in a terrorist attack on December 6, 1992 and thereafter a Hindu temple was built by the terrorists at this place.
The Babri Mosque was a large imposing structure with three domes, one central and two secondary. It is surrounded by two high walls, running parallel to each other and enclosing a large central courtyard with a deep well, which was known for its cold and sweet water. On the high entrance of the domed structure are fixed two stone tablets which bear two inscriptions in Persian declaring that this structure was built by one Mir Baqi on the orders of Babur. The walls of the Babri Mosque are made of coarse-grained whitish sandstone blocks, rectangular in shape, while the domes are made of thin and small burnt bricks. Both these structural ingredients are plastered with thick chunam paste mixed with coarse sand.
One of the columns of the Babri Mosque. Some Hindus say it came from a Temple under the site, particularly noting the two flowers which they say are Hindu-associated lotus motifs, however this motif is common in mosques of that period.The Central Courtyard was surrounded by lavishly curved columns superimposed to increase the height of the ceilings. The plan and the architecture followed the Begumpur Friday mosque of Jahanpanah rather than the Moghul style where Hindu masons used their own trabeated structural and decorative traditions. The excellence of their craftsmanship is noticeable in their vegetal scrolls and lotus patterns.
On mid-night of December 22, 1949, when the police guards were asleep, some miscreants (Abhay Ram Das of Nirmohi Akhara) planted idols of Rama and Sita into the Babri Masjid. This was reported by constable, Mata Prasad, the next morning and recorded at the Ayodhya police station. On hearing this news Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru directed UP Chief Minister Govind Ballabh Pant, to see that the dieties were removed. Under Pant's orders, Chief Secretary Bhagwan Sahay and Inspector-General of Police V.N. Lahiri sent immediate instructions to Faizabad to remove the dieties. However, K.K. Nair feared that the Hindus would retaliate and pleaded inability to carry out the orders. Finally the idols of "Ram Lala" were never removed.
Hindus sought permission to start worship at the mosque which was not granted at that time. However with the permission of the court, the locks of Babri mosque were opened on February 1, 1986 and Hindus were allowed to start worship of idols of Ram Lala. Muslims on the other hand were prevented from offering any prayers at the mosque. India being a pre-dominantly Hindu nation, no court or administration could afford to antogonise the majority community.
Lal Krishna Advani, a high-ranking member of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) (former Home Minister & Deputy Prime Minister) began a campaign tour (a rathayatra, or "chariot-journey") in 1990, to organise support for building a Rama temple at the mosque site.
The mosque was destroyed on December 6, 1992, by a crowd of 75,000 hindu fanatics belonging to militant outfits such as VHP, RSS, Bajrang Dal, Shiv Sena etc. led by top leaders of the BJP, some of whom were later to become ministers in the Union Government, in the surcharged communal atmosphere that followed.
Following the destruction of the mosque, communal riots broke out between Hindus and Muslims across India, including in Mumbai (Bombay), which was a largely secular and cosmopolitan city. About 1500 people, mostly muslims, were killed in an organised genocide of innocents by Hindu terrorists belonging to outfits such as Shiv Sena, VHP, RSS, Bajrang Dal & BJP etc. duly supported by the State Government and the Police.
Some muslim militants later carried out serial bomb blasts in Mumbai in 1993 to avenge the demolition of the Babri Masjid and the genocide of muslims, in which more than 250 people lost there lives.
Extremist Indian Hindus demolishing Babri Masjid
Extremist Hindus are demolishing Babri Masjid
Hindu terrorist attacking the Babri Masjid
Posts
hey man dont call Hindu activist as TERRORISTs.. we r fighting here in our own nation to save our inherent property.... We want Ram temple thr only...!! we r sure we will build it thr only.
ReplyDeletethey are terrorists whether you call them anything you like...
Deletei would like to call you bitch and you people are don't have your own identity. till you people are living under Hindus shadow only and barking against us.
DeleteOrigins
ReplyDeleteHindu account
When the Muslim emperor Babur came down from Ferghana in 1527, he defeated the Hindu King of Chittodgad, Rana Sangrama Singh at Sikri, using cannon and artillery. After this victory, Babur took over the region, leaving his general, Mir Baqi, in charge as viceroy.
Mir Baqi allegedly destroyed the temple at Ayodhya, built by the Hindus to commemorate Rama's birthplace, and built the Babri Masjid, naming it after Emperor Babur.[9] Although there is no reference to the new mosque in Babur's diary, the Baburnama, the pages of the relevant period are missing in the diary. The contemporary Tarikh-i-Babari records that Babur's troops "demolished many Hindu temples at Chanderi"[10]
Palaeographic evidence of an older Hindu temple on the site emerged from an inscription on a thick stone slab recovered from the debris of the demolished structure in 1992. Over 260 other artifacts were recovered on the day of demolition, and many point to being part of the ancient temple. The inscription on the slab has 20 lines, 30 shlokas (verses), and is composed in Sanskrit written in the Nagari script. The ‘Nagari Lipi’ script was prevalent in the eleventh and twelfth century. The crucial part of the message as deciphered by a team comprising epigraphists, Sanskrit scholars, historians and archaeologists including Prof. A.M. Shastri, Dr. K.V. Ramesh, Dr. T.P. Verma, Prof. B.R. Grover, Dr. A.K. Sinha, Dr. Sudha Malaiya, Dr. D.P. Dubey and Dr. G.C. Tripathi.
The first twenty verses are the praises of the king Govind Chandra Gharhwal (AD 1114 to 1154) and his dynasty. The twenty-first verse says the following; "For the salvation of his soul the King, after paying his obeisance at the little feet of Vamana Avatar (the incarnation of a god as a midget Brahmana) went about constructing a wondrous temple for Vishnu Hari (Shri Rama) with marvelous pillars and structure of stone reaching the skies and culminating in a superb top with a massive sphere of gold and projecting shafts in the sky - a temple so grand that no other King in the History of the nation had ever built before."
It further states that this temple (ati-adbhutam) was built in the temple-city of Ayodhya.
In another reference, the Faizabad District Judge on a plaint filed by Mahant Raghubar Das gave a judgment on 18 March 1886. Though the plaint was dismissed, the judgment brought out two relevant points;
"I found that Masjid built by Emperor Babur stands on the border of the town of Ayodhya…. It is most unfortunate that Masjid should have been built on land specially held sacred by the Hindus, but as that event occurred 358 years ago it is too late now to remedy the grievance. All that can be done is to maintain the parties in status quo. In such a case as the present one any innovation would cause more harm and derangement of order than benefit."
Archaeology Society of India report
ReplyDeleteArchaeology of Ayodhya
Archaeological excavations by the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) in 1970, 1992 and 2003 in and around the disputed site have indicated a large Hindu complex existed on the site.
In 2003, by the order of an Indian Court, The Archaeology Society of India was asked to conduct a more indepth study and an excavation to ascertain the type of structure that was beneath the rubble.[13] The summary of the ASI report [14] indicated definite proof of a temple under the mosque. In the words of ASI researchers, they discovered "distinctive features associated with... temples of north India". The excavations yielded:
“ stone and decorated bricks as well as mutilated sculpture of a divine couple and carved architectural features, including foliage patterns, amalaka, kapotapali, doorjamb with semi-circular shrine pilaster, broke octagonal shaft of black schist pillar, lotus motif, circular shrine having pranjala (watershute) in the north and 50 pillar bases in association with a huge structure" [15] ”
Archaeological studies in the 1970s: Project "Archaeology of the Ramayana Sites"
ReplyDeleteThough results were not reported in that period,[citation needed] between 1975 and 1985 an archaeological project was carried out in Ayodhya to examine some sites that were connected to the Ramayana story. The Babri Mosque site was one of the fourteen sites examined during this project. After a gap of many years since the excavation the BB Lal led ASI team claimed in the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) magazine Manthan in October 1990 of having found the pillar-bases of what may have been a temple at the site which must have belonged to a larger building than the Babri Mosque.
The team of archaeologists of the ASI, led by B.B. Lal, found rows of pillar-bases which must have belonged to a larger building than the Babri Mosque.
Accordingly, archaeological findings of burnt bases of pillars made of brick, a few metres from the mosque indicated that a large temple stood in alignment with the Babri Mosque since the 11th century.[1] In a trench at a distance of four metres south of the mosque, parallel rows of pillar-foundations made of brick-bats and stones were found.[2]
Professor Gupta later commented on the findings of the period prior to 1990: "Several of the temple pillars existing in the mosque and pillar- bases unearthed in the excavations conducted in the south of the mosque (although in the adjoining plot of land) show the same directional alignment. This will convince any student of architecture that two sets of material remains belong to one and the same complex.“[3]
une to July 1992
ReplyDeleteIn July 1992, eight eminent archaeologists (among them former ASI directors Dr. Y.D. Sharma and Dr. K.M. Srivastava) went to the Ramkot hill to evaluate and examine the findings. These findings included religious sculptures and a statue of Vishnu. They said that the inner boundary of the disputed structure rests, at least on one side, on an earlier existing structure, which “may have belonged to an earlier temple”. (Indian Express, 4 July 1992.) The objects examined by them also included terracotta Hindu images of the Kushan period (100-300 AD) and carved buff sandstone objects that showed images of Vaishnav deities and of Shiva-Parvati. They concluded that these fragments belong to a temple of the Nagara style (900-1200 AD).
Prof. S.P. Gupta commented on the discoveries:
"The team found that the objects were datable to the period ranging from the 10th through the 12th century AD, i.e., the period of the late Pratiharas and early Gahadvals. (....) These objects included a number of amakalas, i.e., the cogged-wheel type architectural element which crown the bhumi shikharas or spires of subsidiary shrines, as well as the top of the spire or the main shikhara ... This is a characteristic feature of all north Indian temples of the early medieval period (...) There was other evidence - of cornices, pillar capitals, mouldings, door jambs with floral patterns and others - leaving little doubt regarding the existence of a 10th - 12th century temple complex at the site of Ayodhya."[4]
In the January 2003, Canadian geophysicist Claude Robillard performed a search with a ground-penetrating radar. The survey concluded the following:
ReplyDelete"There is some structure under the mosque. The structures were ranging from 0.5 to 5.5 meters in depth that could be associated with ancient and contemporaneous structures such as pillars, foundation walls, slab flooring, extending over a large portion of the site".
Claude Robillard, the chief geophysicist stated the following:
"There are some anomalies found underneath the site relating to some archaeological features. You might associate them (the anomalies) with pillars, or floors, or concrete floors, wall foundation or something. These anomalies could be associated with archaeological features but until we dig, I can't say for sure what the construction is under the mosque."[7]
first u hav 2 know dat realy Ram was exist or not.
ReplyDeleteU people dont know even date of birth of your lord.
Pillars doesnt mean a temple... Pillars is something used to hold the building. Dickheads should understand the civil engineering.
ReplyDeleteASI didnt honestly produced the report. Underneath of walls and whatever fuck found there were also two graves which were not investigated properly. Lets leave that apart. We didnt had robust mechanism at that time to record events. I pray to God that Supreme Court gives the honest judgement.
What i believe is the fact these internal terrorist are dividing us in the name of religion. These mother fuckers like Advani and murli manohar joshi & RSS doesnt know the name of their father. These are unwanted childs of prostitutes and they feel they can rule a democratic country like india.
Can you tell me date of birth of allah. Can you tell me when islamic religion came
DeleteDid ever ram said he is a god? If he is a god then y did he is called as king? Those people who has closed their eyes in under the religious and political influence please come out of it. First you should understant is really rama exits or it is the influence of politics. The mosques are not built for any gods in inslam its only a prayer hall. To build a temple or mosque why are we fighting it can be built anywhere for this y should we loose our beloved once.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI am huted. Wave of jihad
ReplyDeleteI am huted. Wave of jihad
ReplyDeleteKisi ka ghar Tod ke kisi bhi bhagwan ka ghar bana doge to kya bhagwan khus ho jayega nahi balki pap ke or baghidar ban jaoge thu hai aise soch wale insaan pe
ReplyDeleteDear picture louder, where did you get the first photo from ?
ReplyDeleteso interesting!